PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING IN INDUSTRY 4.0: A CONCEPTUAL STUDY OF GENDER DIFFERENCES

Authors

  • NUR DALILAH DAHLAN Department of Sports Science & Recreation, University Technology of MARA Negeri Sembilan Branch, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
  • MOHAMAD FIRDAUS AHMAD Department of Sports Science & Recreation, University Technology of MARA Negeri Sembilan Branch, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
  • AHMAD FIKRI MOHD KASSIM Department of Sports Science & Recreation, University Technology of MARA Perlis Branch, Perlis, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i5.1241

Keywords:

psychological well-being, gender difference, IR 4.0, work and employment

Abstract

The rapid digitalisation and technological advancements associated with Industry 4.0 are transforming work environments, job demands, and employee expectations across sectors. While these changes create new opportunities for flexibility, innovation, and productivity, they also introduce increased pressures that can affect workers’ psychological well-being in different ways. Emerging literature highlights mental health and well-being as critical concerns in the digital era, yet limited attention has been given to how these changes are experienced differently by men and women. This conceptual paper aims to examine gender differences in psychological well-being within the context of Industry 4.0, with a focus on work demands, work–life balance, and organisational support. Through a critical review of existing empirical and theoretical studies, a conceptual framework is proposed, drawing on the Job Demands–Resources (JD–R) theory and supported by Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being model. This framework provides an understanding of how demands and resources associated with Industry 4.0 shape the well-being of men and women in both similar and different ways. The study offers insights for policymakers, organisations, and researchers in developing more inclusive and gender-sensitive strategies to support employee well-being in technology-driven workplaces and contributes to discussions on sustainable work and mental health in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

References

[1] Babnik, K., Benko, E., von Humboldt, S. (2022): Ryff’s psychological well-being scale. – In Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging, Springer International Publishing, Cham 6p.

[2] Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E. (2007): The job demands-resources model: State of the art. – Journal of Managerial Psychology 22(3): 309-328.

[3] Blanchflower, D., Bryson, A. (2024): The gender well-being gap. – Social Indicators Research 173(3): 1-45.

[4] Brussevich, M., Dabla-Norris, E., Kamunge, C., Karnane, P., Khalid, S., Kochhar, K. (2018): Gender, technology, and the future of work. – IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/18/07, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC 42p.

[5] Chen, L., Wu, K., Du, H., King, R.B., Chen, A., Li, T., Chi, P. (2023): Less equal, less satisfied? Gender inequality hampers adults' subjective well-being via gender-role attitudes. – Sex Roles 89(11-12): 718-730.

[6] Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Nachreiner, F., Schaufeli, W.B. (2001): The job demands-resources model of burnout. – Journal of Applied Psychology 86(3): 499-512.

[7] García-Castilla, F.J., Martínez-Sánchez, I., Campos, G., Arroyo Resino, D. (2020): Impact of gender and relationship status on young people's autonomy and psychological wellbeing. – Frontiers in Psychology 11: 16p.

[8] Kumar, P.S. (2024): Technostress: A comprehensive literature review on dimensions, impacts, and management strategies. – Computers in Human Behavior Reports 16: 20p.

[9] Makowska-Tłomak, E., Bedyńska, S., Skorupska, K., Nielek, R. (2026): Women have it worse: An ICT workplace digital transformation stress gender gap. – In Digital Interaction and Machine Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 1636, Springer, Cham 12p.

[10] Matud, M.P., Bethencourt, J.M., Ibáñez, I., Fortes, D. (2020): Gender and psychological well-being in older adults. – International Psychogeriatrics 32(11): 1293-1302.

[11] Matud, M.P., Bethencourt, J.M., Ibáñez, I., Fortes, D., Díaz, A. (2022): Gender differences in psychological well-being in emerging adulthood. – Applied Research in Quality of Life 17(2): 1001-1017.

[12] Ryff, C.D. (1989): Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. – Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(6): 1069-1081.

[13] Ryff, C.D., Keyes, C.L.M. (1995): The structure of psychological well-being revisited. – Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(4): 719-727.

[14] Tomé, G., Gaspar de Matos, M., Reis, M., Gomez-Baya, D., Coelhoso, F., Wiium, N. (2021): Positive youth development and wellbeing: Gender differences. – Frontiers in Psychology 12: 9p.

[15] Yoon, Y., Eisenstadt, M., Lereya, S.T., Deighton, J. (2023): Gender difference in the change of adolescents' mental health and subjective wellbeing trajectories. – European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 32(9): 1569-1578.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING IN INDUSTRY 4.0: A CONCEPTUAL STUDY OF GENDER DIFFERENCES. (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(5), 376-386. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i5.1241