MOTIVATIONAL DESIGN FOR SYNTAX ACQUISITION: EXPLORING ARCS-BASED INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES IN ESL CONTEXTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i5.1396Keywords:
ARCS motivational model, syntax acquisition, ESL learners, learner motivation, instructional strategiesAbstract
This study explores instructional strategies and interventions guided by the ARCS Motivation Model that may enhance students’ motivation towards syntax acquisition. Syntax learning is often perceived as challenging among second language learners due to its abstract and complex nature, which can reduce engagement and hinder meaningful learning. To address this issue, this study employs a document analysis method, drawing on secondary sources from recent literature in second language acquisition, motivational theory, and ARCS- based instructional design, Through content analysis, the study synthesises existing scholarly perspectives to identify hor ARCS strategies: Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction, could be operationalised in syntax instructions. The findings conceptually suggest that attention-enhancing strategies such as visualisation and interactive tasks, relevance-building through contextualised learning, confidence-supporting scaffolded instruction, and satisfaction-oriented mastery activities may collectively contribute to improved learner motivation. When integrated with established linguistic theories such as Universal Grammar and Cognitive Linguistics perspectives, these strategies highlight the interconnected role of cognitive capacity and motivational design in syntax learning. Overall, the study proposes that ARCS Motivational Model interventions offer a meaningful framework for enhancing learner motivation and supporting more effective syntax acquisition in ESL contexts.
References
[1] Chomsky, N. (1981): Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. – Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Netherlands 371p.
[2] Dörnyei, Z. (2020): Innovations and Challenges in Language Learning Motivation. – Routledge, London 186p.
[3] Fang, X., Ng, D.T.K., Leung, J.K.L., Xu, H. (2024): The applications of the ARCS model in instructional design, theoretical framework, and measurement tool: A systematic review of empirical studies. – Interactive Learning Environments 32(10): 5919-5946.
[4] Fauconnier, G., Turner, M. (2002): The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. – Basic Books, New York 440p.
[5] Keller, J.M. (2010): Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach. – Springer, New York 323p.
[6] Papi, M., Bondarenko, A.V., Mansouri, S., Feng, L., Jiang, C. (2019): Rethinking L2 motivation research: The 2 × 2 model of L2 self-guides. – Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(2): 337-361.
[7] Sailer, M., Homner, L. (2020): The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. – Educational Psychology Review 32(1): 77-112.
[8] Ushioda, E. (2020): Language Learning Motivation: An Ethical Agenda for Research. – Oxford University Press 184p.
[9] Zhang, Z.V., Hyland, K. (2018): Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. – Assessing Writing 36: 90-102.
[10] Zhang, Z., Hyland, K. (2022): Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach. – Assessing Writing 51: 15p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ZIYAD FARHAN BAHARRUDIN, HAIDA UMIERA HASHIM, ZULAIKHA KHAIRUDDIN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
