RECATEGORISATION FRAMEWORK GROUNDED IN SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY FOR PROMOTING RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i5.1406Keywords:
social identity theory, recategorisation, religious tolerance, intergroup relations, superordinate identityAbstract
Religious diversity is an increasing feature of contemporary societies, which requires effective mechanisms to enhance peaceful coexistence and social cohesion. But many attempts at religious tolerance are piecemeal and not firmly grounded in well-established social psychological theory, limiting their capacity to effect sustainable change in intergroup bias and conflict. The present research aims to develop a theory-driven framework to enhance religious tolerance through the recategorisation process within Social Identity Theory. The framework was developed through a content analysis of academic literature and an iterative framework development methodology that integrated identity processes, intergroup contact, and superordinate identity formation. The results show that the framework consistently turns identity-based divisions into shared social identities, makes intergroup interactions more meaningful, reduces bias, and encourages open-mindedness. The framework also provides structured educational guidance, encourages community-based interventions, improves reflective learning, and fosters social cohesion. The study concludes that recategorisation is a viable mechanism for promoting sustainable religious tolerance. Future research should test the framework empirically in different multicultural and multireligious settings.
References
[1] Adiprasetya, J. (2025): Befriending religious others. – The Ecumenical Review 76(5): 488-499.
[2] Ahmadi, P., Tabar, F.M. (2025): Modeling structural relationships between dimensions of personal, social, and national identity among students at Islamic Azad University, Hamedan. – Health Nexus 3(2): 120-131.
[3] Ayala, R.L., Alcalde, J.W.E. (2022): Better attitudes toward foreigners: Effects of dual-identity, identity fusion with the country and humanity. – Psykhe 31(SI 1): 1-14.
[4] Bianco, F., Kosic, A., Pierro, A. (2021): The mediating role of national identification, binding foundations and perceived threat on the relationship between need for cognitive closure and prejudice against migrants in Malta. – Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 32(2): 172-185.
[5] Choli, I. (2026): Collaborative learning strategies to increase religious tolerance in students: Building an inclusive and moderate attitude in the campus environment. – Jurnal At-Tarbiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 9(1): 23-31.
[6] Cocco, V.M., Bisagno, E., Visintin, E.P., Cadamuro, A., Di Bernardo, G.A., Shamloo, S.E., Trifiletti, E., Molinari, L., Vezzali, L. (2022): Once upon a time…: Using fairy tales as a form of vicarious contact to prevent stigma-based bullying among schoolchildren. – Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 33(2): 186-201.
[7] Corpuz, J. (2025): Using the parable of the blind men and the elephant as a pedagogical tool for teaching religious pluralism. – Teaching Theology & Religion 28(2): 130-136.
[8] Craig, M.A., Badaan, V., Brown, R.M. (2020): Acting for whom, against what? Group membership and multiple paths to engagement in social change. – Current Opinion in Psychology 35: 41-48.
[9] Curtis, K.A. (2024): European identity’s effect on immigration attitudes: Testing the predictions of the common in-group identity model versus in-group projection model. – Political Psychology 45(5): 803-825.
[10] De Dreu, C.K., Fariña, A., Gross, J., Romano, A. (2022): Prosociality as a foundation for intergroup conflict. – Current Opinion in Psychology 44: 112-116.
[11] Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., Validzic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B., Frazier, S. (1997): Extending the benefits of recategorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure, and helping. – Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33(4): 401-420.
[12] Efremov, A. (2025): The psychology of faith and religious identity: How theology shapes worldview and self-perception. – Pharos Journal of Theology 106(3): 1-15.
[13] Eggins, R.A., Haslam, S.A., Reynolds, K.J. (2002): Social identity and negotiation: Subgroup representation and superordinate consensus. – Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(7): 887-899.
[14] Fierro, J., Parella, S., Sharifi, M. (2024): Public support for the accommodation of religious diversity: The interplay between religious identification, threat perception, and cross-group friendships. – Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 64(1): 38-55.
[15] Friehs, M., Plaza Reveco, A., Schäfer, S.J., González, R., Christ, O. (2025): Does intergroup contact affect political attitudes and behaviours? A longitudinal test of tertiary transfer effects using the Chilean Longitudinal Social Survey (ELSOC). – Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 35(3): 18p.
[16] Fuochi, G., Boin, J., Lucarini, A., Voci, A. (2024): Open your eyes, open your mind: The profile of cognitive liberalization and intergroup contact experiences. – Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 34(5): 16p.
[17] Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F. (2012): Reducing intergroup bias: The common in-group identity model. – In: Van Lange, P.A.M., Kruglanski, A.W., Higgins, E.T. (eds.): Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology Vol. 2, Sage Publications 19p.
[18] Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F. (2011): Common in-group identity model. – In: The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology, Wiley 5p.
[19] Glasford, D.E., Dovidio, J.F., Pratto, F. (2009): I continue to feel so good about us: In-group identification and the use of social identity-enhancing strategies to reduce intragroup dissonance. – Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35(4): 415-427.
[20] González, R., Brown, R. (2003): Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. – European Journal of Social Psychology 33(2): 195-214.
[21] Hogg, M.A. (2016): Social identity theory. – In: McKeown, S., Haji, R., Ferguson, N. (eds.): Understanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory, Springer, Cham 14p.
[22] Inegbedion, H., Sunday, E., Asaleye, A., Lawal, A., Adebanji, A. (2020): Managing diversity for organizational efficiency. – Sage Open 10(1): 10p.
[23] Jadranović, K., Ali, N.H., Sadoon, A.S., Schmid, L.A. (2025): Dynamics of social cohesion in post-conflict Mosul: Group perspectives, challenges and facilitators. – Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 35(5): 14p.
[24] Kershaw, C., Rast, D.E., Hogg, M.A., van Knippenberg, D. (2021): Battling in-group bias with effective intergroup leadership. – British Journal of Social Psychology 60(3): 765-785.
[25] Khadka, C. (2024): Social identity theory and group behavior. – TUTA Journal 16p.
[26] Kimani, S. (2024): The influence of religious beliefs on social behavior and community cohesion. – International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences 3(3): 60-73.
[27] Klik, K.A., Utomo, M.C., Jones, B., Batalha, L., Tropp, L.R., Reynolds, K.J. (2025): Social identity processes in the field: The role of group norms and social identification in prejudice reduction. – Journal of Applied Social Psychology 55(9): 663-677.
[28] La Mela, V. (2024): Meeting the religious other. – The Ecumenical Review 76(1-2): 38-53.
[29] Leder, D., Vaart, W.V.D., Machielse, A. (2025): The impact of religious identity on intergroup encounters. – Archive for the Psychology of Religion 48(2): 215-235.
[30] Lestari, P.A. (2024): Educating for tolerance: Multicultural approaches in Islamic religious education. – Sinergi International Journal of Islamic Studies 2(2): 96-108.
[31] Liu, J.H., Hopner, V., Muldoon, O., Khan, S. (2025): Advancing the interface between research and practice in sustainable development: A view from Political Psychology. – Political Psychology 46(6): 1415-1418.
[32] Lu, F., Yang, J., Yao, X., Song, Y., Chen, D., Zhang, T., Zhang, F. (2025): The impact of social identity complexity on intergroup parochial and universal cooperation under different payoff structures and frames. – Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 116: 11p.
[33] McKeown, S., Schaefer, C.D., Ali, S., Dupont, P., Manley, D., Rao, S., Taylor, L.K., Meleady, R. (2024): The longitudinal relationship between youth intergroup contact and social cohesion outcomes in two divided societies. – European Journal of Social Psychology 55(6): 1016-1031.
[34] Moran, D., Liu, V., Taylor, L. (2024): Who, how, and when do children help? A systematic review of children’s out-group prosocial behavior. – Political Psychology 45(S1): 119-155.
[35] Ng, J.H., Morton, T.A., Kirby, T.A. (2025): Cultural fit in campus spaces: Acculturation orientations shape the perceived restorativeness of minority and majority environments. – Journal of Applied Social Psychology 55(12): 1004-1018.
[36] Nirwana, M.D., Kriyantono, R., Mashuri, A., Hakim, M.L. (2025): Strategic communication of superordinate identity in international marketing: Evidence from Malaysia Madani to reduce Indonesian tourism avoidance. – Asia Pacific Management and Business Application 14(1): 49-70.
[37] Novella, A.W.F., Nevriyarni, S. (2026): Teori identitas sosial, stereotipe & prasangka. – Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi 3(1): 505-515.
[38] Orazani, S.N., Reynolds, K.J., Osborne, H. (2023): What works and why in interventions to strengthen social cohesion: A systematic review. – Journal of Applied Social Psychology 53(10): 938-995.
[39] Oyler, D.L., Price-Blackshear, M.A., Pratscher, S.D., Bettencourt, B.A. (2022): Mindfulness and intergroup bias: A systematic review. – Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 25(4): 1107-1138.
[40] Paluck, E.L., Porat, R., Clark, C.S., Green, D.P. (2021): Prejudice reduction: Progress and challenges. – Annual Review of Psychology 72: 533-560.
[41] Paolini, S., White, F.A., Tropp, L.R., Turner, R.N., Page-Gould, E., Barlow, F.K., Gómez, Á. (2021): Intergroup contact research in the 21st century: Lessons learned and forward progress if we remain open. – Journal of Social Issues 77(1): 11-37.
[42] Pettigrew, T.F. (2021): Advancing intergroup contact theory: Comments on the issue’s articles. – Journal of Social Issues 77(1): 258-273.
[43] Poluektova, O., Spaccatini, F., Giovannelli, I., Pagliaro, S., Pacilli, M.G. (2026): Bridging the gap in public trust in science: An intergroup relations perspective. – British Journal of Social Psychology 65(1): 8p.
[44] Raissi, H., Kappmeier, M. (2025): Implications of religious salience and religious practices on the senses of belonging to the larger Aotearoa/New Zealand society and the Muslim community. – Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 20(4): 959-978.
[45] Shafi, S., Akbar, W., Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M. (2024): A study of reducing prejudice and improving intergroup relations of the students at school level through different teaching approaches. – Global Social Sciences Review 9(4): 124-134.
[46] Shamoa-Nir, L. (2024): Exploring contact theory in intergroup dialogue: An examination of attitudes and experiences in secular-religious discourse across diverse socio-religious subgroups. – Cogent Social Sciences 10(1): 17p.
[47] Shkurko, A.V. (2021): Strategies of universalism: Ten routes toward unbiased solutions to social problems. – International Social Science Journal 72(243): 9-27.
[48] Skinner-Dorkenoo, A.L., George, M., Wages III, J.E., Sánchez, S., Perry, S.P. (2023): A systemic approach to the psychology of racial bias within individuals and society. – Nature Reviews Psychology 2(7): 392-406.
[49] Sohlberg, J., Esaiasson, P. (2024): Dual superordinate identities in Sweden’s vulnerable neighborhoods: Stronger local and national identities associated with increases in institutional and interpersonal trust. – Political Psychology 46(2): 435-454.
[50] Sprengholz, P., Betsch, C., Böhm, R. (2024): Experimental testing of three categorization-based interventions to reduce prejudice and discrimination against the unvaccinated in the aftermath of COVID-19. – Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 24(2): 552-566.
[51] Tropp, L.R. (2021): Crossing to safety: Attachment processes in intergroup contact. – Journal of Social Issues 77(1): 86-104.
[52] Tropp, L.R., White, F., Rucinski, C.L., Tredoux, C. (2022): Intergroup contact and prejudice reduction: Prospects and challenges in changing youth attitudes. – Review of General Psychology 26(3): 342-360.
[53] Uğurlar, P., Dorrough, A.R., Isler, O., Yilmaz, O. (2025): Shared group memberships mitigate intergroup bias in cooperation. – Social Psychological and Personality Science 16(2): 214-223.
[54] Valsecchi, G., Berent, J., Borinca, I., Green, E.G., Falomir-Pichastor, J.M. (2024): Inclusive social norms and nationals’ positive intergroup orientations toward refugees: The moderating role of initial prejudice and intergroup contact. – Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 27(2): 322-347.
[55] Verkuyten, M., Yogeeswaran, K., Adelman, L. (2023): The social psychology of intergroup tolerance and intolerance. – European Review of Social Psychology 34(1): 1-43.
[56] Williams, S.A., Eden, S., Megdal, S.B., Joe-Gaddy, V. (2023): Diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice in water dialogues: A review and conceptualization. – Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education 177(1): 113-139.
[57] Yogeeswaran, K., Gale, J., Verkuyten, M. (2021): Interculturalism as a strategy to manage diversity: Moving psychological research beyond colorblindness and multiculturalism. – Social and Personality Psychology Compass 15(10): 16p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 MOHD AMZARI TUMIRAN, NASHARUDDIN MOHAMMAD, SITI KHURSHIAH MOHD MANSOR, SYUHAIDA IDHA ABD RAHIM, MOHD HERZALI MUHAMMAD HALED, SIRIAUPA SALLEH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
